Planning Commission Tables Crawford Hoying Plan as Traffic Dominates First Hearing

The Municipal Planning Commission tabled Crawford Hoying's 17.6-acre mixed-use proposal for West Wilson Bridge Road on July 9. Ten residents spoke — most in support — and nearly all of them talked about traffic.

This story is part of Worthington Pulse's coverage of the July 9 Architectural Review Board and Municipal Planning Commission meeting. Start with the July 9 meeting recap.

Worthington's Municipal Planning Commission took its first public look at Crawford Hoying's plan to replace three aging office buildings on West Wilson Bridge Road with a mixed-use neighborhood of apartments, condominiums, offices, shops and two hotels, then tabled it, as city staff had said from the outset it would have to.

The application cannot move forward without a traffic study, and there isn't one yet.

Ten residents came to the podium during the July 9 hearing. Most said they supported the project, and then spent their three minutes voicing traffic concerns.

What Is Being Proposed

The application covers 400, 450 and 500 West Wilson Bridge Road, roughly 17.6 acres holding the westernmost buildings of the Officescape Corporate Center. Crawford Hoying, the Dublin developer behind Bridge Park, bought five buildings along the corridor in 2025. These three would be demolished. The other two are being renovated to house existing tenants.

According to the city's project page, the preliminary plan calls for:

Multifamily apartments 250 units
Condominiums 182 units
Senior living 150 units
Townhomes 8 units
Hotel rooms 290 keys, across two hotels
Office 211,000 sq ft
Retail, restaurants and food service 134,600 sq ft
Parking 2,381 spaces

The site would be built in three phases, east to west, organized around a curving interior street the design team calls "the bend," with a central park that can be closed to cars for events. Townhomes would face West Wilson Bridge Road at three stories, with buildings stepping up to five and six stories toward Interstate 270. The team described that step-down as a deliberate effort to avoid presenting a wall to the neighborhood across the street.

Those figures are substantially larger than the concept Crawford Hoying showed the neighborhood in April, which described roughly 400 residential units, 100,000 square feet of retail and 150,000 square feet of office. The plan now before the commission has 440 apartments, condominiums and townhomes, plus another 150 senior living units, and more of both office and retail. Residents noticed. One told the commission the scope, size and density of the project were "tremendous" and asked the commission not to make rezoning decisions until the community has had a chance to weigh in.

Russell Hunter, Crawford Hoying's executive vice president of development, addressed the Bridge Park comparison head-on.

"Bridge Park comes with us everywhere we go," he said. "We would be fools to try to create another one five miles down the road," he added. "That's not what the intention is here. This is less dense, this is different, and we learned a lot of lessons when we built that."

Among the lessons: "What we have learned at Bridge Park is that we grossly overbuilt parking." And on the public spaces: "Bridge Park's a little bit too hard. We've got to soften it up a little bit."

Traffic Was the Subject

Planning Coordinator Lynda Bitar set the terms before the applicant said a word. The commission could table the application and nothing else, she said, because critical pieces were missing. "The most important is a traffic study." She told the board that a number of residents had emailed the commission that day and the day before, and that many of them wrote about traffic.

They then said it again in person. Of the ten residents who spoke, six raised traffic: cut-through routes, speeding, or the safety of the Wilson Bridge and Rieber intersection. Several of them opened by saying they were in favor of the project.

The concern is specific. It has less to do with the development's own driveways than with what happens when West Wilson Bridge Road and High Street back up: drivers' navigation apps route them off the arterials and into the neighborhoods to the south. Residents named the route. Rieber Street and Caren Avenue are used as a shortcut between Wilson Bridge Road and State Route 161, and one resident traced it through four subdivisions on the way, naming Worthington Estates, Olentangy Hills, Worthingway and Medick Estates.

One resident, who said he had lived in the area since 1990 and worked 35 years as a civil engineer, spoke simply to support the project. Others were more pointed. A resident told the commission she could only imagine West Wilson Bridge Road being widened to four lanes to absorb the traffic, and that she did not want it "to become a superhighway. We've already got 270 right beyond it," she said.

Another laid out why the neighborhood streets are a poor place to put displaced traffic: they are a walking route to school, they have no streetlights, and parking is allowed on both sides, which narrows the roadway. Worthington Estates Elementary School sits at 6760 Rieber Street and Worthingway Middle School is a short walk beyond that.

A resident whose property adjoins the site said he was "optimistic and excited about having some new neighbors" but wanted the pedestrian design inside the plan extended out to the Wilson Bridge and Rieber intersection. Another, who supports the project and praised the developer's outreach as "exceptional," said the problem may not even be Crawford Hoying's to solve: "I don't know that it's their problem to deal with. I think it's our problem." She asked the city to look at speeding on Rieber, Caren and other streets named as possible cut throughs, before anything is built, because "people don't even stop at stop signs anymore here."

A resident who said he grew up in the area was for the project and said Worthington "needs this kind of energy." He also called the cut-through concerns valid, and told the commission the city needs to "shake this NIMBYism" or it will "stagnate and die."

Commission members did not distance themselves from any of it. Chair Mikel Coulter volunteered that he cuts through Rieber himself, "guilty, but I do stop at the stop signs," and framed the stakes for the project and the neighborhood together.

"It's a significant part of what's gonna make this project work, not only for them but for the neighborhoods as well. We cannot get it wrong." — Chair Mikel Coulter

Stay connected to what's happening in Worthington, Ohio.

The Rieber Street Question

The design decision most directly tied to the neighborhood's central objection has changed since Crawford Hoying first showed the project, and it has changed in the direction residents were afraid of.

At the first community meeting in April, the plan called for disconnecting the development's internal road from the Rieber Street intersection, specifically so the site could not be used as a cut-through to the neighborhood to the south. The primary signalized entrance was to be at the west end of the site. By the second community meeting in June, that had reversed, and the connection at Rieber was back in the plan.

The drawings the commission saw on July 9 keep it as well. The design team said it had "retained the existing intersection at Rieber, as well as the entry that's coming from on the west side." A resident reading the submitted plans told the commission that "the developers' plans show the main entrance and exit at the intersection of Rieber and Wilson Bridge Road."

That is the same street residents spent the evening asking the city to protect, and the same street Worthington Estates Elementary School sits on.

At least one commission member has the same reservation. Secretary Kathy Holcombe, attending virtually, suggested that the entrance into the central park area may not belong in line with Rieber Street. Neither the commission nor city staff asked the applicant to explain the change, and the applicant did not address it.

What the City Is Doing About Traffic

City Engineer John Moorehead told the commission there is not yet a traffic study for this development, so he would not speculate about its impacts. He did describe the larger effort already underway.

The city commissioned a comprehensive study of the Wilson Bridge corridor and portions of High Street about a year ago, at a cost of roughly $275,000. It covers the stretch from Olentangy River Road east to the AAA building on East Wilson Bridge Road, and includes both the High Street and Caren Avenue intersections. A preliminary report is due in about a month.

The city has asked Crawford Hoying to draft its own traffic study so that it feeds the city's corridor model rather than sitting beside it. The goal is a single picture of the corridor rather than one project analyzed in isolation.

That is close to what one resident asked for from the podium. He told the commission a traffic study "really, to be effective, should assume the total development of the area," not each project incrementally. He named the Chick-fil-A expected around 2027 as an example and asked for an explicit analysis of cut-throughs. The city's study, approved by Council in July 2025, was already scoped to examine seven intersections including Caren and High, and to account for Chick-fil-A among other pending developments.

Moorehead did not treat the neighborhood's fear as hypothetical. The concerns he had heard that night about cut-through traffic and speeding "are valid," he said, and the pattern already exists a few streets over: around Evening Street Elementary School, "you do see quite a bit of cut-through traffic from people leaving High Street going to 161."

He also named the underlying cause, which predates this application by decades.

"What has been happening in specifically the intersection of High and Wilson Bridge Road over the past several decades is just regional growth," he said, citing growth to the north, east and west, and especially along the U.S. 23 corridor. When the main roads back up, he said, "that's where people's GPS updates them: hey, I've got a faster route, just take a left here. They end up on these residential neighborhoods."

Planning & Building Director R. Lee Brown added that the five-year short-range plan at COTA, the regional transit authority, now includes a possible east-west route extension along Wilson Bridge Road, added in part because the city told the agency this development was coming. Whether it happens depends on ridership.

Brown also corrected a piece of the record. Worthington has never actually approved a hotel. One was approved as part of Worthington Gateway, on the old Holiday Inn site, but the pandemic intervened and what got built instead was a four-story office building with ground-floor retail.

The Board's Verdict on the Design

On the architecture, the reviews were tougher than on the concept.

Board member Edwin Hofmann delivered the sharpest assessment of the night. He said Worthington has a recognizable character worth studying, and that the renderings did not reflect it.

Hofmann pressed on massing and density, asking the team to push the building edges north, away from West Wilson Bridge Road, to create a real buffer against the houses across the street. "That's the one disadvantage you truly have," he said. "You're not backed up against a beautiful waterway like they are in Dublin. You're backed up against a residential neighborhood, and we need to absolutely respect that."

He was equally blunt about the western green space, where the plan runs a road through the middle of a lawn: "It just feels like a lawn with a road through it. Let's push the road out of the way. Nobody wants the road. What we want is the space."

Coulter had a related reaction to the renderings, which he said reminded him of Morton Grove, the Chicago suburb: large office buildings, set back, heavy on ribbon glass. He wants the architecture to develop a Worthington character, and told the applicant that lighting, bollards, benches and bicycle racks will get real scrutiny when drawings come back.

Board member Ben Niebauer, who lives in Worthington Estates, thanked the team for preserving two things the neighborhood cares about (the shared-use path along West Wilson Bridge Road and the sledding hill at Olentangy Parklands), then questioned whether a hotel deserves the prime corner overlooking the park rather than something for residents. He also asked the team to design so that COTA service could actually be accommodated if routes are ever expanded.

Board member Susan Hinz picked up on the two buildings at the western edge, highly visible from I-270, and framed them as an opportunity: Worthington does not have a strong gateway on that side of the city, and these buildings could become one. She also noticed something in the developer's language. Hunter had described the project as a neighborhood rather than a development, she said, "and that means a lot to me."

Hofmann raised one more point: the Worthington Mall is likely to redevelop as well. "Maybe you guys are in the race to get there first," he told the applicant.

Vice Chair David Foust remarked on the tenor of the evening, noting that on a project this size the community input was unusually coherent. "Everybody seems to be on the same page for what they want to see and don't want to see," he said.

What Happens Next

The commission voted to table the application. It returns for at least one or two more public meetings before any recommendation goes to City Council, and Coulter told the audience the project "is not going to go before city council from this commission for a while." Residents will have another chance to speak at the commission, and another at Council.

Crawford Hoying's own best case has zoning finished in 2026, an economic development agreement with the city in late 2026 and early 2027, building design through 2027, and construction starting in 2028. "It's possible that dirt could move in '27," Hunter said, "but it's actually far more likely that it moves in '28." Three of the buildings on the site still have tenants under lease.

The city has created a project page for the redevelopment where the submitted drawings are posted and where residents can sign up for email notification of every meeting on this item: worthington.org/2468/W-Wilson-Bridge-Rd-Mixed-Use-Development.

Emailed comments go to the whole board and commission. Coulter said he reads every one. Another member asked residents to send them a day or two ahead of the meeting rather than the afternoon of, so that members actually have time to read them.


This story comes from the July 9 meeting recap. For earlier coverage of the proposal, see Crawford Hoying Shares Detailed West Wilson Bridge Designs Ahead of First Planning Commission Review.

Stay connected to what's happening in Worthington, Ohio.

Subscribe to get local stories delivered to your inbox.

© 2026 Worthington Pulse. Keeping you connected to your local government.